![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() | Simulating propagation of separated wave modes in general anisotropic media, Part I: qP-wave propagators | ![]() |
![]() |
Figure 9 shows an example of simulating propagation of separated qP-wave fields in a 3D homogeneous
vertical ORT model, in which
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
, and
.
The first three pictures display wavefield snapshots at 0.5s synthesized by using
pseudo-pure-mode qP-wave equation, according to equation B-3.
As shown in Figure 9d, qP-waves again appear to dominate the wavefields in energy when we sum the
three wavefield components of the pseudo-pure-mode qP-wave fields.
As for TI media, we obtain completely separated qP-wave fields from the
pseudo-pure-mode wavefields once the correction of projection deviation is finished (Figure 9e).
By the way, in all above examples, we find that the filtering to remove qSV-waves does not
require the numerical dispersion of the qS-waves to be limited. So there is no additional requirement
of the grid size for qS-wave propagation. The effects of grid dispersion for the separation of low velocity
qS-waves will be further investigated in the second article of this series.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
PseudoPurePx,PseudoPurePy,PseudoPurePz,PseudoPureP,PseudoPureSepP
Figure 9. Synthesized wavefield snapshots in a 3D homogeneous vertical ORT medium: (a) x-, (b) y- and (c) z-component of the pseudo-pure-mode qP-wave fields, (d) pseudo-pure-mode scalar qP-wave fields, (e) separated scalar qP-wave fields. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() | Simulating propagation of separated wave modes in general anisotropic media, Part I: qP-wave propagators | ![]() |
![]() |