|
|
|
| Nonlinear structure-enhancing filtering using plane-wave prediction | |
|
Next: Appendex B: Lower-upper-middle filter
Up: Liu etc.: Structurally nonlinear
Previous: Acknowledgments
Fomel (2007a) defined local similarity as follows. The global
correlation coefficient between two different signals and
is the functional
|
(5) |
where
denotes the dot product between two signals
|
(6) |
In a linear algebra notation, the squared correlation coefficient
from equation A-1 can be represented as a product of two
least-squares inverses
|
(7) |
|
(8) |
|
(9) |
where is a vector notation for , is a
vector notation for , and
denotes the
dot product operation defined in equation A-2. Let
be a diagonal operator composed of the elements of
and be a diagonal operator composed of the
elements of . Localizing equations A-4
and A-5 amounts to adding regularization to
inversion. Scalars and turn into vectors
and defined, using shaping
regularization (Fomel, 2007b)
|
(10) |
|
(11) |
where scaling controls the relative scaling of operators
and . Finally, the componentwise product of
vectors and defines the local similarity
measure.
For using time-dependent smooth weights in the stacking process, the
local similarity amplitude can be chosen as a weight for stacking
seismic data. We thus stack only those parts of the predicted data whose
similarity to the reference one is comparatively large (Liu et al., 2009a).
|
|
|
| Nonlinear structure-enhancing filtering using plane-wave prediction | |
|
Next: Appendex B: Lower-upper-middle filter
Up: Liu etc.: Structurally nonlinear
Previous: Acknowledgments
2013-07-26