on the interface
to the receiver
on the interface
can be written as
where
is the number of interfaces and
for
denotes the point of intersection between the ray and
the
-th interface (Figure 1). Every intersection point
and the receiver
depend on the distance
, whereas the source at
does not. The two-point traveltime
in the
-th layer is given by
where
denotes the arc length along the ray between
and
, and
denotes the group slowness (1/group velocity) of the
-th layer that depends on
. Assuming that in each layer
only varies horizontally, equation 2 can be rewritten as
where
denotes the horizontal coordinate (midpoint direction) and
is the angle of the raypath with respect to the vertical. In the following derivation, we assume that the lateral heterogeneity influences are weak and the resulting traveltime perturbations can be computed with respect to a straight raypath in each homogeneous sublayer. Therefore, we assume that
is constant for each
-th layer and rewrite equation 3 as follows (Grechka and Tsvankin, 1999; Lynn and Claerbout, 1982):
Equations 1 and 4 serve as the basis for our construction in this study, where we seek the following second-order total one-way traveltime derivative,
evaluated at
with respect to the reference vertical ray in a 1-D anisotropic medium (Figure 1). We denote the reference intersection point by
and use `capital letters' to denote quantities evaluated with respect to the reference 1-D anisotropic medium.
In consideration of reflection traveltime, equation 5 is related to the NMO velocity as follows:
where
is the one-way zero-offset traveltime from the point
on the reflector to the surface. In the case of diffraction traveltime, equation 5 can be related to time-migration velocity as follows:
where
is the one-way vertical traveltime from the point scatterer
to the surface and we replace
with
. Even though
and
have the same mathematical expression, they represent two different quantities. In case of reflection traveltime, it is common to use
to denote half-offset. On the other hand, in consideration of diffraction traveltime, we use
here to denote the distance between the escape location
of image ray and any surrounding point
on the surface. We give a brief review on the derivation of equations 6 and 7 in Appendix A.
Because both NMO velocity (equation 6) for reflection traveltime and time-migration velocity (equation 7) for diffraction traveltime are related to the one-way traveltime derivative of a ray (either normal-incidence or image ray), it is, in principle, sufficient to study the effects from lateral heterogeneity on such derivative of a generic ray travelling between a subsurface position and the surface. We shall adopt this notion in this paper and begin our study by first looking at how the desired second-order one-way traveltime derivative evaluated at the surface (equation 5) is related to the derivatives of
in each sublayer based on the Fermat's principle. This relationship will be used to accumulate the total effects of lateral heterogeneity from all sublayers.