The case of residual DMO complicates the building of a dynamic
equation because of the essential nonlinearity of the kinematic
equation (30). One possible way to linearize the
problem is to increase the order of the equation. In this case, the
resultant dynamic equation would include a term that has the
second-order derivative with respect to velocity . Such an equation
describes two different modes of wave propagation and requires
additional initial conditions to separate them. Another possible way
to linearize equation (30) is to approximate it at
small dip angles.
In this case, the dynamic
equation would contain only the first-order derivative with respect to
the velocity and high-order derivatives with respect to the other
parameters. The third, and probably the most attractive, method is to
change the domain of consideration. For example, one could switch from
the common-offset domain to the domain of offset dip. This
method implies a transformation similar to slant stacking of
common-midpoint gathers in the post-migration domain in order to
obtain the local offset dip information. Equation (30)
transforms, with the help of the results from Appendix A, to the form
(48)
with
(49)
and
(50)
For a constant offset dip
, the dynamic analog of equation (48) is the
third-order partial differential equation
(51)
Equation (51) does not strictly comply with the theory of
second-order linear differential equations. Its properties and
practical applicability require further research.
Velocity continuation and the anatomy of
residual prestack time migration