|
|
|
| Seismic data decomposition into spectral components using regularized nonstationary autoregression | |
|
Next: Benchmark tests
Up: Fomel: Regularized nonstationary autoregression
Previous: Regularized nonstationary regression
Prony's method of data analysis was developed originally for
representing a noiseless signal as a sum of exponential components
(Prony, 1795). It was extended later to noisy signals, complex
exponentials, and spectral analysis
(Pisarenko, 1973; Beylkin and Monzón, 2005; Marple, 1987; Bath, 1995). The basic idea follows
from the fundamental property of exponential functions:
. In
signal-processing terms, it implies that a time sequence
(with real or complex ) is predictable
by a two-point prediction-error filter
, or, in the Z-transform notation,
|
(6) |
where
. If the signal is composed of multiple exponentials,
|
(7) |
they can be predicted simultaneously by using a convolution of several
two-point prediction-error filters:
where
.
This observation suggests the following three-step algorithm:
- Estimate a prediction-error filter from the data by determining filter coefficients
from the least-squares minimization of
|
(9) |
- Writing the filter as a polynomial (equation 8), find its complex roots
. The exponential factors
are determined then as
|
(10) |
- Estimate amplitudes
of different components in equation 7 by linear least-squares fitting.
Prony's method can be applied in sliding windows, which was a
technique developed by Russian
geophysicists (Mitrofanov and Priimenko, 2011; Gritsenko et al., 2001) for identifying low-frequency
seismic anomalies (Mitrofanov et al., 1998). I propose to extend it to
smoothly nonstationary analysis by applying the following modifications:
- Using RNAR, the filter coefficients become smoothly-varying functions of time , which allows the filter to adapt to nonstationary changes in the input data.
- At each instance of time, roots of the corresponding polynomial also become functions of time . I apply a robust, eigenvalue-based algorithm for root finding (Toh and Trefethen, 1994).
The instantaneous frequency of different components is
determined directly from the phase of different roots:
|
(11) |
- Finally, using RNR, I estimate smoothly-varying amplitudes of different components .
The nonstationary decomposition model for a complex signal is thus
|
(12) |
and the local phase corresponds to time integration of the
instantaneous frequency determined in Step 2:
|
(13) |
For ease of analysis, real signals can be transformed to the
complex domain by using analytical traces (Taner et al., 1979).
Subsections
|
|
|
| Seismic data decomposition into spectral components using regularized nonstationary autoregression | |
|
Next: Benchmark tests
Up: Fomel: Regularized nonstationary autoregression
Previous: Regularized nonstationary regression
2013-10-09