The second example is a post-stack section, as shown in Figure 7a. This data set has much more curved events than the first example. However, by using the plane-wave flattening algorithm, we can still get a well-fattened section that is suitable for applying an EMD based smoothing operator. The reflection-enhanced data is shown in Figure 7b. Figure 7c shows the difference section before and after the smoothing. We also zoom two parts from the original section and filtered section, and show them in Figure 8. The comparison also shows that the proposed seismic reflection enhancing process can help obtain much more continuous events.
gath0,flat,flat-emd
Figure 2. Pre-stack data example. (a) Pre-stack data. (b) Flattened domain using plane-wave flattening. (c) EMD filtering in the flattened domain. |
---|
flat-emd-rec0,dif
Figure 3. Pre-stack data example. (a) Seismic reflection enhanced data using EMD. (c) Difference section between Figures 2a and 3a. |
---|
dip
Figure 4. Local slope of pre-stack data example for plane-wave flattening. |
---|
zooma-1,zooma-2
Figure 5. Pre-stack data example. (a) Zoomed sections corresponding to the framebox A in Figure 2a. (b) Zoomed sections corresponding to the framebox A in Figure 3a. |
---|
zoomb-1,zoomb-2
Figure 6. Pre-stack data example. (a) Zoomed sections corresponding to the framebox B in Figure 2a. (b) Zoomed sections corresponding to the framebox B in Figure 3a. |
---|
post-gath0,post-emd-rec0,post-dif
Figure 7. Post-stack data example. (a) Post-stack data. (b) Signal enhanced data. (c) Difference. |
---|
post-zooma-1,post-zooma-2,post-zoomb-1,post-zoomb-2
Figure 8. Post-stack data example. (a) & (b) Zoomed sections corresponding to the framebox C in Figure 7. (c) & (d) Zoomed sections corresponding to the framebox D in Figure 7. |
---|