|
|
|
|
Isotropic angle-domain elastic reverse-time migration |
Consider the images (Figures 6)
obtained using the imaging conditionfrom
equation
applied to the data
(Figures 4a and 4b)
from the preceding example.
Because we used an explosive source for
our simulation, the source wavefield contains mostly P-wave energy,
while the receiver wavefield contains P- and S-wave mode
energy. Helmholtz decomposition after extrapolation but prior to
imaging isolates P and S wavefield components. Therefore, migration
produces images of reflectivity corresponding to PP and PS
reflections, Figures 6a and 6b, but
not reflectivity corresponding to SP or SS reflections,
Figures 6c and 6d. The illumination
regions are different between PP and PS images, due to different
illumination angles of the two propagation modes for the given
acquisition geometry. The PS image, Figure 6b, also shows
the usual polarity reversal for positive and negative angles of
incidence measured relative to the reflector normal. By
comparing Figures 6a and 6b with
Figures 5a and 5b, it is apparent
that the crosstalk in the images obtained from displacement-based
imaging condition is more prominent than the one obtained from
potential-based imaging conditions, especially in
Figure 5a. Furthermore, the polarity in
Figure 5b, normally taken as the PS image, does
not reverse polarity at normal incidence, which is not correct
either.
|
|
|
|
Isotropic angle-domain elastic reverse-time migration |