![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() | Noncausal ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
---|
data
Figure 6. The 3D field data cube after time migration. |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
---|
flt-np
Figure 7. The imaginary part of ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
wi,wi-2,wi-3
Figure 8. The slice X of field data cube. (a) Original data; (b) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
wc,wc-2,wc-3
Figure 9. The slice Y of field data cube. (a) Original data; (b) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|
wt,wt-2,wt-3
Figure 10. The time slice of field data cube. (a) Original data; (b) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The
-
-
NRNA method is applied to a 3D image after time migration (Fig. 6).
The shallow structures are simple plane layers (above 1 s) and the deep structures
are complex curved layers (below 1 s). We respectively apply
-
NRNA and
-
-
NRNA to enhance the reflectors of this 3D image cube. Fig. 7 shows the imaginary
part of
-
-
NRNA coefficients at a given shift
.
Similar to synthetic example, the
-
-
NRNA coefficients are smooth and reflect
the information of event dips. In this example, we use M=2 for
-
-
NRNA and
M=8 for
-
NRNA, respectively. Figs. 8(a)- 8(c) and 9(a)- 9(c) respectively shows the X and Y
slices after
-
NRNA noise attenuation and
-
-
NRNA noise attenuation. We
can find that
-
-
NRNA method can give a better result than
-
NRNA method.
The result of
-
-
NRNA has a much better lateral continuity. These two methods
not only improve the shallow plane events evidently (e.g. 0s -0.5s), but also
improve the deep curved surface events (e.g. the area indicated by ellipse).
This is because these two methods both are nonstationary methods, which is
suitable for curved events. In addition, comparing
-
NRNA and
-
-
NRNA
methods from time slices (Fig. 10(a)- 10(c)), one can also see that the
-
-
NRNA
gives more consistent result. The lateral continuity and trace-by-trace
consistency of the reflections are crucial in structural interpretation
of seismic data by reflection picking especially for the auto-picking
tools of interactive interpretation systems (Fomel, 2010).
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() | Noncausal ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() |
![]() |