next up previous [pdf]

Next: Conclusion and discussion Up: Numerical examples Previous: Marmousi model

Sigsbee model

The last example is Sigsbee model shown in Figure 9. The spatial interval is $ \Delta x=\Delta z=25m$ . 55 shots are evenly distributed on the surface of the model. We still perform $ nt=13000$ time steps for each shot (301 receivers). Due to the larger model size, 75% boundaries have to be stored with the aid of pinned memory. Our RTM result is shown in Figure 10. Again, the resulting image obtained by normalized cross-correlation imaging condition exhibits better resolution for the edges of the salt body and the diffraction points. Some events in the image using normalized cross-correlation imaging condition are more visible, while they have a much lower amplitude or are even completely lost in the image of cross-correlation imaging condition.

sigsbee
sigsbee
Figure 9.
The Sigsbee velocity model.
[pdf] [png] [scons]

simag1 simag2
simag1,simag2
Figure 10.
RTM result of Sigsbee model using effective boundary saving scheme (staggered grid finite difference). (a) Result of cross-correlation imaging condition. (b) Result of normalized cross-correlation imaging condition.
[pdf] [pdf] [png] [png] [scons]


next up previous [pdf]

Next: Conclusion and discussion Up: Numerical examples Previous: Marmousi model

2021-08-31